It's quite noticeable that any characters that are nice to Mary are given much more positive character sketches than the ones who are against her.

Of course, this makes for a very lively and readable account, but it also allows for a lot of emotive language to be used, exposing the author's prejudices. While the history is solid, Fraser's style tends towards the chatty rather than the drily academic. It's the assessment of Mary's personality and the reasons (or excuses) for her behaviour that has me putting on my sceptic's hat. Her conclusions about Darnley's murder and the Babington plot are hard to dispute, and largely puts Mary in the clear with regard to her actual purported crimes. Of the myths that have built up about Mary's life over the centuries, Fraser has no hesitation in debunking the more ludicrous ones, and provides good evidence to support much of her analysis.

On the whole, this is very good popular history - the research is thorough, and many of the sources are examined both for facts and for trustworthiness. In the event, while my prejudices were certainly not affirmed here, they did help me to maintain some perspective in the face of what turned out to be a very partisan book - Fraser is very pro-Mary indeed. I've always been firmly in the Elizabeth camp, and in comparison, Mary has always seemed rather like a spoilt and unstable bimbo who bats her eyelashes to get her own way, and then peevishly blows her husbands up when thwarted. I have to admit I approached this book from a fairly anti-Mary perspective.

Mary Queen of Scots by Antonia Fraser